April 28, 2024

Managers’ Roles Change Again

I received an intelligent response to my blog about managers’ roles changing from my good friend Bruce Braun, so here it is:

Your commentary got me thinking about why is it that just about every business management book or magazine article focuses on the roles and responsibilities of management. 

What about the roles and responsibilities of employees or subordinates?  Without them, work doesn’t happen.  Are they just worker bees carrying out the functions or assignments?   Or are they an integral part of ensuring how well an organization performs?

Managerial attitudes are important, but so equally are employee attitudes.  Co-equal for sure.

How about books that address how to be a great employee?  Inward circumspection rather than only outward expectations?

I’ve noticed, as I’m sure you have (as you’ve written about) the generational shift in attitudes towards work and work ethics.  Here are some of my observations over the past 15-20 years:

Responsibility to my employer: From “I will work hard to learn all I can about my industry, job, and company to be the best I can be.” Shifts to “All I need to know is about my current assignment.”  From “I know that it takes three to five years to become really good at something.” Shifts to “My career has stalled if I’ve not been promoted along with a raise within 12-18 months. Experience is highly overrated, the crutch and refuge of dinosaurs.” From “I believe if I work hard and perform there is a career path to more responsibility.” Shifts to “What’s a profession or career? Everyone is expendable.”

Management Responsibility: From “I’m grateful I was hired and given this opportunity to learn, grow, and prove myself.” Shifts to “My manager’s job is to teach me everything I need to know so I can be promoted.”  From “I understand my boss is carrying out the directives of the higher-ups.  I’ll do my best to help achieve those goals.”  Shifts to “Why was I not consulted about these directives?  I deserve to be part of the decision-making process despite only being here for six months.”

Participation in the Office:  From “Work begins in the office at 8:30 AM, Monday thru Friday.” Shifts to “Why do I need to come to an office?  The pandemic proved we can all work from home or remotely with hours I will determine.”  From: “In-person 1:1 interaction on a daily basis is critical to collaboration and teamwork.” Shifts to “Zoom video calls are all I need.  Who needs to be in an office full of people who stifle my thinking and productivity?” 

Choosing a Profession and Career Path: From “I want a career in this profession/industry that will help me achieve my professional and personal goals.  If I really love what I do, it won’t be work.” Shifts to “I have no idea what I really want to be when I grow up.  I’ll give this job a shot until it bores me and then I’ll check out being a social media influencer.”  From “I’ll give this job and company my best, believing hard work and perseverance will result in success.” Shifts to “If Elon Musk buys this place, screw him and his politics, I’ll quit.  Billionaires are the scourge of society, other than Jeff Bezos, because Amazon rocks despite being anti-union.  What’s the Washington Post?  None of my friends read newspapers, too old school.”

Managers’ Roles Shift

Even though I’m semi-retired (I teach two courses a year at The New School), I can’t break a 55-year habit of reading about management and management trends.

My favorite books over those years have been: Peter Drucker’s The Practice of Management, Peters and Waterman’s In Search of Excellence, Richard N.Foster’s Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage, John Kotter’s Leading Change and Jim Collins’s Good to Great.

My favorite magazine has been the Harvard Business Review and its online blog, HBR.org. I’m probably being too nerdy, but HBR is the only magazine I tend to read cover to cover because I’m still fascinated by how the media and academia, where I have spent my entire career, are managed.

In general, I believe the legacy media–newspapers, magazines, broadcasting and outdoor (OOH)–are quite poorly managed, with the exception of The New York Times, the Washington Post, the Harvard Business Review and iHeart Media. Of the new media, Google clearly leads the way, and Facebook is a at the bottom of the pack.

If the media, in general, are poorly managed, then academia is disastrously managed. Administrative and bureaucratic bloat has gotten bloatier and less productive in the last several years as tenure, among other things, continues to stifle innovation.

Management-challenged media companies and academic institutions would do well to read a Harvard Business Review article in the current March-April issue titled “Managers Can’t Do It All: It’s Time to Reinvent Their Role for the New World of Work” by Diane Gherson and Lynda Gratton. In the article the authors write that the roles of managers have changed across three dimensions: power, skills and structure. Here’s how the roles have changed:

POWER: From “My team makes me successful” shifts to “I’m here to make my team successful.” From “I’m rewarded for achieving business goals” shifts to “I’m also rewarded for improving team engagement, inclusion and skills relevancy.” From “I control how people move beyond my unit” shifts to “I scout for talent and help my team move fluidly to wider opportunities.”                         

SKILLS: From “I oversee work” shifts to “I track outcomes.” From “I assess team members against expectations” shifts to “I coach them to achieve their potential and invite their feedback on my management.” From “I provide work direction and share information from above” shifts to “I supply inspiration, sensemaking and emotional support.
STRUCTURE: From “I manage an intact team of people in fixed jobs in a physical workspace” shifts to “My team is fluid and the workspace is digital.” From “I set goals and make assessments annually” shifts to “I provide ongoing guidance in priorities and performance feedback.” From “I hold an annual career discussion focused on the next promotion” shifts to “I’m always retraining my team and providing career coaching.”

Wow! The centralized command-and-control, top-down management style of media management that I grew up in and probably used is going the way of the buggy whip. Let’s hope media companies and academia read the Harvard Business Review and change their management style, and let’s hope Vladimir Putin and the Russian military don’t.

     

I Was Wrong

I was wrong in my April 14 blog titled “Winning” in which I predicted that Jack Welsh’s book “Winning will soon go to the top of the non-fiction best-seller list and stay there longer than Good to Great, the current champ.”
Winning has been doing pretty well on the best seller list, but it isn’t #1 in the latest New York Times monthly Business Hard Cover Best Seller list. Welsh’s book is #10, down from #6 the previous week, but it is one ahead of Good to Great, which moved up to #11 from #12 the previous week. So it looks as though Winning is slipping and Good to Great is holding up, contrary to what I predicted.
I still think Winning is an indispensable management book that is very how-to and hands-on, but it might not have as many long-lasting lessons as Good Great. Therefore, I’m putting up a link to Jim Collins’s classic book below and recommending that you add it to your management bookshelf.

You Can Learn a Lot From Art

As I walked through the billowing saffron panels of The Gates at dusk last evening, I began looking for lessons in Christo and Jeanne-Claude’s environmental art in Central Park. I recalled a time about 18 years ago when Bob Pittman was head of MTV and, at my request, he came to talk to students at Menlo College where I was teaching at the time. A student asked Bob where he got his creative ideas for MTV. Bob replied that he often visited galleries and museums to look at art—mostly paintings—to inspire him and teach him practical lessons about life and how to solve problems. “What a brilliant insight,” I thought at the time.
I thought of Bob’s insightful remark as I walked through The Gates as a brisk wind blew the fluttering orangish panels parallel to the ground. A few of the panels had wrapped around some of the uprights and were no longer waving. I knew the monitors who Christo hired to keep the panels flowing and to protect them from vandalism would unfurl the wrapped panels in their assigned areas in the morning. They would use their long, boat-hook-like tools with a thin, bent mental hook at the end that was used to rip off a Velcro strip that opened the cloth boot that wrapped the nylon saffron panels up before they were unfurled. But after the crews and monitors used the tool to unfurl the panels, a chartreuse tennis ball was cut and placed over the hooks so they could be used to free panels that might be wrapped around uprights without hurting the nylon panel material. The light green tennis balls were the complementary color to the saffron of the panels.
As I looked at The Gates, the lesson that came to me was that they were not only a monumental creative idea, but an immensely complicated project that could never have been pulled off without flawless execution. It took 26 years of planning and paying attention to the minute details of execution on the part of Christo’s brilliant engineer, Vince Davenport, which made the idea of The Gates a beautiful reality.
Over the weekend The Gates opened, Carly Fiorina, the CEO of HP was fired by the HP board of directors. I read stories throughout the week in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, business magazines, and on the Internet in Marketplace and other business-oriented sites about why one of the highest-ranking and most visible female corporate executives lost her job. Some of the business pundits thought it was her imperious style that did her in—spotlight-seeking, increasing the number of corporate jets, eating lunch alone in her office and not practicing management by walking around, which David Packard had made famous. Others opined that Fiorina, with a sales and marketing background, was never accepted in the engineering-dominated and family-like culture of HP. Other thought she was toast the moment she changed the name from Hewlett-Packard to HP.
However, the HP board approved the merger with Compaq, it approved the name change to HP, it backed her strategy for growth, and it praised her marketing efforts. What undid Fiorina was not her style or her strategy or the HP culture, it was her inability to execute on her grand plans or to get enough people to cooperate in helping her execute. The board recommended that Fiorina hire a chief operating officer and restructure to give herself more operating help. She refused; she didn’t want to give up any power (sound like some big media companies?).
Perhaps Fiorina should have read Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan’s, Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. The book is required reading in my online graduate course, Media Management and Leadership, for the University of Missouri School of Journalism because just as execution was the key to the success of The Gates, execution is the key to success in business.
You can learn a lot about business and life from reading a book or from art.